Social classesIn the previous section, we've considered the possibility that not all people are identical - while some are highly mobile, others may not be. To account for this, the software allows to define multiple social classes which are randomly distributed across the grid. Each class can have its own mobility (and of course probability to move). Thus, we can simulate a population in which most people more or less stay at home, but some do not.
Superspreading eventsTo see this effect in the simulation, let's introduce a class society. Create the following config file:
There's now three classes defined - initially 80% of the people are rather restricted in their interaction and only 20% (with a mobility of 5) have a larger radius. In the previous section we saw that with a mobility of 3 for everyone, the disease hardly propagates at all. As you can verify when you run the scenario, adding 20% of people with a mobility of 5 changes the picture - now the infection spreads much faster.
Now, let's introduce a very small fraction of highly mobile (and hence efficient) spreaders. Change the fraction of the second class to 0.19 and of the third class to 0.01 and re-run. The effect is rather pronounced and the infection spreads much faster (though not exponential - still we can observe daily decreasing growth percentages). Make the fraction even smaller - let's have 0.199 for class two and 0.001 for class three. Still there is an effect (all scenarios are summarized here):
Why is that the case? The reason is that we've seen that low mobility equals a geometric constraint - infections have to remain inside the expanding flame front and hence early on large parts of the grid are simply unaffected:
The picture changes when even a small percentage of highly mobile people is introduced - these can 'jump ahead' of the front and seed new outbreaks of the infection elsewhere.
Once more people are highly mobile, the seeding is no longer contained in individual spots but generates a fuzzy front that can be filled by locally propagating infections fairly efficiently.
ConsequencesThe above illustrates quite well the importance of restricting situations in which people can mix with a potentially huge social group - such as sports events or concerts. Even if only a small fraction of the population participates in such superspreading events, this can significantly accelerate the spread by seeding new infection clusters.
Continue with Prior immunity.
Back to main index Back to science Back to numerical epidemic